- About the Action
- Events
- PhD workshop - Ljubljana 2014
- Action Open Conference - Ljubljana 2014
- New Media and Participation conference - Istanbul 2013
- Belgrade meeting 2013
- Media literacy research and policy - Brussels 2013
- ICA Pre-Conference 2013
- Tampere meeting 2013
- Budapest workshop 2012
- Milan meeting 2012
- Brussels PhD workshop 2012
- Brussels Action workshop 2012
- London meeting 2011
- Zagreb Conference 2011
- Lisbon meeting 2010
- Affiliated events
- WG 1
- WG 2
- WG 3
- WG 4
- Cross-WG
- Output
Older adults
Loos, E., Romano Bergstrom (2014). Older adults. Romano Bergstrom & Schall, J.S.(Eds.). Eye Tracking in User Experience Design , 313-329Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Abstract: Website Navigation and Search Behavior of Older Adults Websites tend to be produced by young designers, who often assume that all users have perfect vision and motor control, and know everything about the Web. These assumptions rarely hold, even when the users are not seniors. However, as indicated by our usability metrics, seniors are more hurt by usability problems than younger users. Among the obvious physical attributes often affected by human aging processes are eyesight, precision of movement, and memory. – Pernice & Nielsen, 2002, p.4 If we want to gain insight into the website navigation and search behavior of older adults, then it is important to compare their performance to younger and middle-age adults. Eye tracking enables us to qualitatively and quantitatively assess the differences in performance among user groups. It provides information about user behaviour above and beyond what users are able to tell us and what we observe in typical measures of performance. Interested in the rest of the text of this chapter and the whole volume? http://www.amazon.com/Eye-Tracking-User-Experience-Design/dp/012408138X References Ball, K. K., Beard, B. L., Roenker, D. L., Miller, R. L. & Griggs, D. S. (1988). Age and visual search: expanding the useful field of view. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 5, 2210-2219. Becker, H. E. (Ed.) (1992). Dynamics of cohort and generation research: Proceedings of a symposium held on 12, 13 and 14 December 1991 at the University of Utrecht, the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Thesis publishers. Blackler, A., Popovic, V., & Mahar, D. (2006). Toward a design methodology for applying intutive interaction. Paper presented at the WonderGround: 2006 Design Research Society International Conference, Lisbon, Portugal. Bouma, H. (2000). Document and interface design for older citizens. In P. Westendorp, C. Jansen, & R. Punselie (Eds.), Interface design & document design (pp. 67-80). Amsterdam: Rodopi. Braver, T. S. & West, R. (2008). Working memory, executive control, and aging. In F. I. M. Craik, & T. A, Salthouse (2008). The Handbook of Aging and Cognition 3rd edition (pp. 311-372). New York: Psychology Press. Chadwick-Dias, A., McNulty, M. & Tullis, T. S. (2003).Web usability and age: How design changes can improve performance. CUU’03, November 10-11, 2003, Vancover, British Columbia, Canada. http://www.bentley.edu/events/agingbydesign2004/presentations/ tedesco_chadwickdias_tullis_webusabilityandage.pdf Charness, N. (2001). Aging and communication: Human factors issues. In N. Charness, D. C. Parks, & B. A. Sabel. (Eds..), Communication, technology and aging: Opportunities and challenges for the future (pp. 1-29). New York: Springer. Charness, N. Schumann, C. E. & Boritz, G. A. (1992). Training older adults in word processing: Effects of age, experience, and interface. Presentation prepared for the Workshop on Aging and Disabilities in the Information Age, John Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. Chisnell, D. & Redish, J. (2004). Designing Websites for Older Adults: A Review of recent research. AARP. Available at: <http://www.aarp.org/ olderwiserwired>. Chisnell, D. & Redish, J. (2012). Modelling Older Adults for Website Design. In E. F. Loos, L. Haddon, & E. A. Mante-Meijer (Eds.), Generational use of new media (pp. 107-128). Farnham: Ashgate. Coleman, R, Clarkson, J., Dong, H. & Cassim, J. (2007). Design for inclusivity. A practical guide to accessible, innovative and user-centred design. Aldershot: Gower. Corso, J. F. (1992). The functionality of aging sensory systems. In: H. Bouma & J.A.M. Graafmans (Eds.), Gerontechnology (pp. 51-78). Amsterdam: IOS Press. Czaja, S. J. & Lee, C. C. (2001). The internet and older adults: Design challenges and opportunities. In N. Charness, D.C. Parks, & B.A. Sabel, B.A. (Eds.), Communication, technology and aging: Opportunities and challenges for the future (pp. 60-78). New York: Springer. Czaja, S. J. & Lee, C. C. (2009). Information technology and older adults. In A. Sears & J. E. Jacko (Eds.), Human-computer interaction: Designing for diverse users and domains (pp. 17-32). Boca Raton: CRC Press. Czaja, S. J., Charit, J., Ownby, R., Roth, D. L. & Nair, S. (2001). Examining age differences in performance of a complex information search and retrieval task. Psychology and Aging, 21, 333-352. Docampo Rama, M., Ridder, H. & Bouma, H. (2001). Technology generation and age in using layered user interfaces. Gerontechjournal, 1 (1), 25-39. Echt, K. V. (2002). Designing web-based health information for older adults: Visual considerations and design directives. In R. W. Morrell (Ed.), Older Adults, Health Information, and the World Wide Web (pp. 61-87). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum. Fisk, A. D., Rogers, W. A., Charness, N., Czaja, S. J. & Sharit, J. (2009). Designing for Older Adults: Principles and Creative Human Factors. Boca Raton: CRC Press. Goldberg, J. H. & Wichansky, A. M. (2003). Eye tracking in usability evaluation: A practitioner’s guide. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The Mind’s Eye: Cognitive and Applied Aspects of Eye Movement Research. Amsterdam. Graafmans, J., Taipale, V. & Charness, N. (1998). Gerontechnology: A Sustainable Investment in the Future. Amsterdam etc.: IOS Press. Gregor, P., Newell, A. F. & Zajicek, M. (2002). Designing for dynamic diversity - interfaces for older people, ASSETS 2002, 151-156. Hawkins, D., Strohl, J. & Romano Bergstrom, J. C. (2013). Individual Differences in Eye Movements During the Visual Search of Websites. Poster presentation at the Human Computer Interaction International (HCII) Conference, Las Vegas, NV, July 2013. Hawthorn, D. (2003). How Universal is good design for older users? Conference paper, ACM SIGCAPH Computers and the Physically Handicapped, Proceedings of the 2003 conference on universal usability, issue 73-74. Hill, R., Dickinson, A., Arnott, J., Gregor, P. & McIver, L. (2011). Older users’ eye movements: Experience counts, CHI 2011, May 7-12 Vancouver, BC, Canada. Hofmann, D. & Schwender, C. (2007). Biographical functions of cinema and film preferences among older German adults. A representative quantitative survey, Communications. The European Journal of Communication Research, 32, 473-491. Houtepen, L. (2007). Op zoek naar Informatie. Onderzoek naar het vinden en beoordelen van informatie op de websites van de vijf grootste zorgverzekeraars [Unpublished Master thesis]. Utrecht: Utrecht University / Utrecht School of Governance. Howard, J. H., Howard, D. V., Dennis, N. A. & Yankovich, H. (2007). Event Timing and Age Deficits in Higher-Order Sequence Learning. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 14(6), 647–668. Huysmans, F., de Haan, J. & van den Broek, A. (2004). Achter de schermen: Een kwart eeuw lezen, luisteren, kijken en internetten. The Hague: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau. Johnson, R. & Kent, S. (2007). Designing universal access: web application for the elderly and disabled, Cognition, Technology & Work 9, 209-218. Kline, D. W. & Schieber, F. J. (1985). Vision and aging. In: J. E. Birren, & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the Psychology of Aging (pp. 296-331). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold. Loos, E. F. (2011). In Search of Information on Websites: A Question of Age? In C. Stephanidis (Ed.), Universal Access in HCI, Part II, HCII 2011, LNCS 6766 (pp. 196-204). Berlijn, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. Loos, E. F, & Mante-Meijer (2012). Getting access to website health information. In E. F. Loos, Haddon, L. & E. A. Mante-Meijer (Eds.), Generational use of new media (pp. 185-202). Farnham: Ashgate. Lunn, D. & Harper, S. (2009). Senior Citizens and The Web. Manchester: School of Computer Science. Mares, M. L. & Woodard, E. (2006). In search of the older audience: Adult differences in television viewing, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50, 595-614. Mendelson, J. & Romano Bergstrom, J. C. (2013). Age differences in the knowledge and usage of QR codes. Proceedings from the Human Computer Interaction International Conference, July 2013, Las Vegas, NV. Mitzner, T. L., Touron, D. R., Rogers, W. A. & Hertzog, C. Checking it Twice: Age-related Differences in Double Checking during Visual Search. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 54(18), 1326–1330 (2010). Mofatt, K. A. & McGrenere, J. (2004). Slipping and drifting: Using older users to uncover pen-based target acquisition difficulties. ASSETS ’07: Proceedings of the 9th International ACM SIGAACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, 11-18, New York: ACM. Olson, K. E., O’Brien, M., Rogers, W. A. & Charness, N. (2011). Diffusion of technology: Frequency of use for younger and older adults. Ageing International, 36(1), 123–145. Olmsted-Hawala, E. L. Romano Bergstrom, J. C. & Rogers, W. (2013). Age-related differences in search strategy and performance when using a data-rich Web site. Proceedings from the Human Computer Interaction International Conference, July 2013, Las Vegas, NV. Peiser, W. (1999). The television generation’s relation to the mass media in Germany: Accounting for the impact of private television, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 43, 364-385. Pernice, K. & Nielsen, J. (2002). Web Usability for Senior Citizens. Design Guidelines Based on Usability Studies with People Age 65 and Older. Fremont: Nielsen Norman Group. Rogers, W. A. & Fisk, A. D. (2000). Human factors, applied cognition and aging. In F. I. M. Craik & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.), The Handbook of Aging and Cognition (pp. 559-591). Mahwah, New Jersey, London: Lawrence Erlbaum. Romano, J. C. (2010). Using eye tracking to examine age-related differences in web site performance, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 54th Annual Meeting, 1360-1364. Romano Bergstrom, J. C. & Olmsted-Hawala, E. L. (2012). Effects of Age and Think-Aloud Protocol on Eye-Tracking Data and Usability Measures. Poster presentation at Usability Professionals Association (UPA) Conference, Las Vegas, NV, June 2012. Romano Bergstrom, J. C., Olmsted-Hawala, E. L. & Jans, M. E. (2013). Age-related differences in eye tracking and usability performance: Web site usability for older adults. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 29, 541-548. Romano Bergstrom, J. C., Olmsted-Hawala, E. L. & Bergstrom, H. C. (under review). Older adults fail to see the peripheral parts of the display during a Web site search task. Sackmann, R. & Weymann, A. (1994). Die Technisierung des Alltags. Generationen und technische Innovationen. Frankfurt, Campus Verlag. Salthouse, T. A. (1979). Adult age and the speed–accuracy trade-off. Ergonomics, 22(7), 811-821. Salthouse, T. A. (2010). Major Issues in Cognitive Aging. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. Schneider, B. A. & Pichora-Fuller, M. K. (2000). Implications of perceptual deterioration for cognitive aging research. In F. I. M. Craik &, T. A. Salthouse (Eds.), The Handbook of Aging and Cognition (pp. 155-219). Mahwah, New Jersey, London: Lawrence Erlbaum. Sears, A. & Jacko, J. E. (Ed.) (2009). Human-computer interaction. Designing for diverse users and domains. Boca Raton: CRC Press. Smith, M. W., Sharit, J. & Czaja, S. J. (1999). Aging, motor control and the performance of computer mouse track. Human Factors, 41 (3), 389-397. Stephanidis, C. (Ed.) (2001). Universal Access in HCI: Towards an information Society for All. Vol. 3. Mahwah, New Jersey, London: Lawrence Erlbaum. Strayer, D., Wickens, C. & Braune, R. Adult age differences in the speed and capacity of information processing: II An electrophysiological approach. Psychology and Aging 2(2), 99-110 (1987) Tullis, T. S. (2007). Older adults and the Web: Lessons learned from eye-tracking’. In C. Stephanidis (Ed.), Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Coping with diversity, HCI, LNCS 4554 (pp. 1030-1039. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer. van der Goot, M. (2009). Stand van de wetenschap. Televisiekijken in het leven van ouderen:een literatuuroverzicht, Tijdschrift voor Communicatiewetenschap, 37 (3), 254-267. Vercruyssen, M. (1997). Movement control and speed of behavior. In A. D. Fisk, & W. A. Rogers (Eds.), Handbook of Human Factors and the Older Adult (pp. 55-86). San Diego CA: Academic Press. Walker, N., Millians, J. Worden, A. (1996). Mouse accelerations and performance of older computer users. Proceedings of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 40th Annual Meeting. Santa Monica, CA, 151-154. Walker, N., Philbin, D. A. & Fisk, A. D. (1997). Age-related differences in movement control.: Adjusting submovement structure to optimize performance. Journal of Gerontology: Psycological Sciences, 52B, P40-P52. Wichansky, A. M. (2000). Usability testing in 2000 and beyond, Ergonomics, 43 (7), 998-1006. Wright, P. (2000). Supportive documentation for older people. In P. Westendorp, C. Jansen, & R. Punselie (Eds.), Interface design & document design (pp. 81-100). Amsterdam: Rodopi. Zajicek, M. (2007). Web 2.0: Hype or happiness. W4A ’07: Poceedings of the 2007 international cross-disciplinary conference on Web acessibility (W4A). New York: ACM. Zajicek, M. & Morissey, W. (2003). Multimodality and interactional differences in older adults. In N. Carbonell (Ed.), Multimodality: A step towards universal access, special issue of Universal access in the information society, 2 (2), 125-133. Zaphiris, P. & Savitch, N. (2008). Age-related differences in browsing the Web. In SPARC Workshop on” Promoting independence through technology”, Reading, England.