- About the Action
- Events
- PhD workshop - Ljubljana 2014
- Action Open Conference - Ljubljana 2014
- New Media and Participation conference - Istanbul 2013
- Belgrade meeting 2013
- Media literacy research and policy - Brussels 2013
- ICA Pre-Conference 2013
- Tampere meeting 2013
- Budapest workshop 2012
- Milan meeting 2012
- Brussels PhD workshop 2012
- Brussels Action workshop 2012
- London meeting 2011
- Zagreb Conference 2011
- Lisbon meeting 2010
- Affiliated events
- WG 1
- WG 2
- WG 3
- WG 4
- Cross-WG
- Output
Evaluating Journalism Through Popular Culture: HBO’s The Newsroom and Public Reflections on the State of the News Media
Peters, C. (2014). Evaluating Journalism Through Popular Culture: HBO’s The Newsroom and Public Reflections on the State of the News Media. Media, Culture & Society, forthcoming.
Abstract: While HBO’s The Newsroom presents itself as fictional television, its narrative is clearly driven by critiquing American cable news culture and contemporary journalism ethics. This paper analyses popular reflections on the program to identify what these discourses reveal about public evaluations of the state of the US news media. Based upon 1115 lengthy audience posts and discussions, and 49 news articles, I argue the response to this supposedly ‘fictional’ newscast nonetheless reveals a highly politicized scepticism about the actual news media, and a corresponding – though fairly depoliticized and surprisingly uniform – nostalgic lament for the journalism of days gone by. Similarly, findings suggest that the traditional modernist discourse of journalism as a public good persists – both amongst journalists and the public – despite the evident commercial underpinnings of the American media system. The study finds audiences and journalists alike use the show as a catalyst to: 1) ‘name and shame’ news outlets – including the fictional Newsroom; 2) engage in political confrontation; and 3) employ the rhetoric and metanarratives of the Anglo-American objectivity regime to define ‘good’ journalism. However, it also finds that while individuals may embrace critique, they often lack critical skills to go beyond politicized accusations of bias.